Triforce of the Gods wrote:So I think I may have encountered a game ending bug.Spoiler:
Maybe bug Ubisoft or whoever about it and hope it gets patched? There have been reports of several bugs like this with no indication that they may be fixed.
Triforce of the Gods wrote:So I think I may have encountered a game ending bug.Spoiler:






CrispyGoomba wrote:I really want them to make a sequel to this game so they can fix all of the problems it currently has. And I have to say, is it just me or are the maps confusing as hell?


Triforce of the Gods wrote:I went to replay it in normal mode to get the rest of the Uplay achievements before I attempt Survival Mode. I need the survivor score of 2000 and to hack all the junction boxes. I got more games for Christmas, though (had ZombiU since launch), so I've been preoccupied with those.

coffeewithchess wrote:Has anybody here finished the game on Survival Mode? I thoroughly enjoyed the single-player campaign, and have attempted Survival Mode I think three times now, and failed miserably all three times. My neighbor is borrowing it right now, and I'm going to attempt Survival Mode again in the future when I get it back, but I think my next goal is to finish the campaign again with fewer than 10 survivors used...

GoNiners wrote:Yup, I finished it on Survivor Mode. It was an intense experience from beginning to end. I was ranked around 17th when I did it, but I'm sure I've dropped plenty since then.
Did you have a question about the mode or the ending?


GoNiners wrote:@Coffee: Thanks! I plan on playing some more to master different weapons, but Black Ops 2 currently hogs my gaming time.
Also, I read your other ZombiU "reviews" analysis. It was a good read! Actually, I think you may have mentioned it to me on the Miiverse (I'm SuperSmashBro).
Posted from my Wii U



CrispyGoomba wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if some reviewers do that. I mean, if it's taken them a long time to go through the game and if the owner of said site wanted the review up on launch day for ad revenue and such, they'll just have to wing it.Spoiler:


CrispyGoomba wrote:Wow, how lame. I'd say it's pretty obvious that they probably didn't get halfway through the game. I feel a little bad that this game got the low reviews it got. It's not that bad of a game, so I'm going to go with the reviewers who rated it low aren't a fan of the genre.
Actually, I looked it up on Youtube and found IGN's play-through of the game and found the spot where I 'died' at. Turns out, apparently I died right when the cut scene triggered so that's pretty much crap. Basically, I wasn't suppose to die.
And speaking of glitches, the time between this post and my last post, I've been playing this game. When looting a zombie, the game switched to the third person camera view on the TV as it should, however, my gamepad screen didn't turn into the inventory screen. So now I can't move my character and I'm going to have to quit the game. Hopefully it'll just go back to my last save so I can still get my weapons from my dead character.

coffeewithchess wrote:CrispyGoomba wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if some reviewers do that. I mean, if it's taken them a long time to go through the game and if the owner of said site wanted the review up on launch day for ad revenue and such, they'll just have to wing it.Spoiler:
Well, what happened on one site when I asked about it? Comments deleted showing the review was not finished when, published. I was banned, then unbanned. Then threatened with another ban, apparently if I ask other reviewers how long they play games. He called it "undermining the review" or something along those lines...asking "How long did you play the game?" or "Did you finish the game?" is undermining a review?
Then, when a site gives the game a "Low" in "Replay Value", but the "reviewer" failed to mention how many hours it took him to beat it, I asked...and have received no response, and he blocked me...because apparently asking that question isn't needed. Same now with the first site. I asked the "reviewer" earlier tonight if he had finished the game yet, being 100% serious, because I was curious if he thought any differently about it assuming he had finished it by now...BLOCKED! LOL, I mean...the game gives you hours played and survivors to finish. It's not rocket science, or disagreeing with their opinions (though, some of them have incorrect information, or lack information), it's them simply reporting what the game tells them, or even simpler...hopping on the activity Wii U channel that shows them hours played on games.
As for your spoiler...do you know if you died, died...or if it was setup that way? I still have no clue if I died, or if what happened was supposed to happen. I have it all recorded, and watching it again still doesn't give me a clue as to what happened...
I'm going to play it again though, and I'm really hoping to finish it well this time, and KNOW what happens...

BlueRangerVegeta wrote:Who were these reviewers? We need names/sites man.
In their defense though ZombiU is one of the buggiest games I myself has played. It really feels like an early beta build tbh. How the game launched with the C4 glitch, let alone any others, is beyond me and a testament to just how sloppy Ubisoft as a whole is.

Users browsing this forum: Aiddon