Advertisements
Player Select
User Reviews
October 29, 2009 by RawmeatCowboy
Filed Under: Wii
"(porting Epic Mickey is) a decision that other people in the Disney organisation are going to make." - Warren Spector
We heard that the game was originally planned for the 360 and PS3, but then development was completely moved over to the Wii. Could things actually end up going in reverse this time around?
Story Feedback
October 29, 2009 at 1:26 pm
It was the president of Disney Interactive who suggested the game being Wii-exclusive in the first place. WS wanted to focus on one platform to make the game the best it can be.
October 29, 2009 at 3:00 pm
It would be fun if "the others" were the ones getting the ports, for a change
Please log in using your message board account to post feeback.
Don't have an account? Click here to register!
Don't have an account? Click here to register!


more













Either way this is probably what so many Wii-only owners are afraid or wary of. That they might end up with a Nintendo-player and only ports or inferior versions of noticeable third party games like this. Understandable to be angry about that too, but it's not really the developers or publishers fault alone.
So what I am really curious about is how the competition's motion controls will end up. If there's going to be killer apps for them right away or if they also need that awfully long time to have developers jump on it. But then, I get the impression MS and Sony put that stuff into devs hands much earlier than Nintendo did with the original Wii or the WM+.