I feel like most of these reviewers never play the multiplayer. A 4/10 for this game is needlessly harsh. It isn't revolutionary but to say it isn't at least decent and a more than solid multiplayer game is I think a misstep. Revolutionary, no... bad, no...

Ya some of the reviews are like for the shovel ware they complain about. Which they still score better than this.

the problem is that they try to review the game as objectively as possible. they don't see what this game means for other games. or at least they don't want that fact influencing the review score.

I am both amazed and confused at these reviews... It's almost as if they're bad mouthing the game because it has garnered so much hype around it, as if they want it to fail... I mean, a 4/10? Have they even played the game? I own every console and I can honestly say that I enjoy The Conduit just as much as the Halos and the Killzones, not because it's innovative, not because it's story is captivating, but because it's damn fun! Remember that guys? When video games used to be all about having fun?