Login

Famitsu - review scores

2064: Read Only Memories (PS4) – 8/8/8/8 [32/40]
Beyblade: Burst God (3DS) – 8/8/8/8 [32/40]
Call of Duty: WWII (PS4) – 9/9/9/9 [36/40]
Call of Duty: WWII (Xbox One) – 9/9/9/9 [36/40]
Kamidanomi Shisugite Ore no Mirai ga Yabai (PS Vita) – 6/7/7/7 [27/40]
Pokemon Ultra Sun / Ultra Moon (3DS) – 9/9/9/9 [36/40]
Tonari ni Kanojo no Iru Shiawase: Two Farce (PS4) – 7/7/6/8 [28/40]
Tonari ni Kanojo no Iru Shiawase: Two Farce (PS Vita) – 7/7/6/8 [28/40]
The Town of Light (PS4) – 7/7/6/7 [27/40]
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (PS4) – 8/8/8/8 [32/40]
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (Xbox One) – 8/8/8/8 [32/40]
Zombie Gold Rush (Switch) – 7/7/7/8 [29/40]

According to Famitsu, Pokemon Ultra Sun/Ultra Moon is exactly one point higher than Sonic Forces. I'll leave the commentary to you guys.

Categories: Reviews, Consoles, Portables
Tags: 3ds, eshop, switch

Comments

Top Rated Comment
Tue Nov 14 17 07:27am
Rating: 8 (Updated 1 time)

to Famitsu, Pokemon Ultra Sun/Ultra Moon is exactly one point higher than Sonic Forces. I'll leave the commentary to you guys.

Really don‘t get the bash here. It‘s like comparing Fifa to Call of Duty. Sonic Forces is a platformer and Pokemon an RPG. The comparison to the original Sun/Moon would be much more interesting here than compare the scores of Sonic and Pokemon with each other.

I‘m also not that surprised by the score. These are not completely new games with a new generation and full new content. Black and White 2 received also a score of 36/40 from the Famitsu. Little disappointed here by RMC, such comments only leads to more toxic behavior here on Go Nintendo and actually insults people who liked Forces. Don‘t wanna complain too much now, but it was just an unnecessary comment I think.

Tue Nov 14 17 07:27am
Rating: 8 (Updated 1 time)

to Famitsu, Pokemon Ultra Sun/Ultra Moon is exactly one point higher than Sonic Forces. I'll leave the commentary to you guys.

Really don‘t get the bash here. It‘s like comparing Fifa to Call of Duty. Sonic Forces is a platformer and Pokemon an RPG. The comparison to the original Sun/Moon would be much more interesting here than compare the scores of Sonic and Pokemon with each other.

I‘m also not that surprised by the score. These are not completely new games with a new generation and full new content. Black and White 2 received also a score of 36/40 from the Famitsu. Little disappointed here by RMC, such comments only leads to more toxic behavior here on Go Nintendo and actually insults people who liked Forces. Don‘t wanna complain too much now, but it was just an unnecessary comment I think.

But...there was no bash?? I swear, we live in such weird times where everyone is either overly-hyper sensitive to anything, or too much attention is focused on things that truly aren’t deserving of said attention.

Maybe just...idk...let it be.

I myself like knowing that the two scored close to one another. But that’s just me.

Call of Duty better than Wolfenstein II? Nahhh.

Expected for US/UM, can't way for the naysayers to use this review as proof that the game is rushed and worse than S/M (even tho fan-favorite B2W2 also had the same score).

Also can't wait till they sell last than S/M and people hate on it for that as well (even tho all third versions end up selling about 50% of what the previous games do and b2w2 sold a bit more due to it being 2 games instead of one). Which is one of the reasons this game is unfortunately split in two (I wish it was one cartridge myself ]= )

Expected for US/UM, can't way for the naysayers to use this review as proof that the game is rushed and worse than S/M (even tho fan-favorite B2W2 also had the same score).

36/40 seems like a good score. And S/M isn't really a bad game gameplay wise either...what's your point?

Also can't wait till they sell last than S/M and people hate on it for that as well

Who hates it? Also S/M is a fresh air and does new things and many liked it.

Which is one of the reasons this game is unfortunately split in two (I wish it was one cartridge myself ]= )

Uhh...you do know that Pokemon has a long history of releasing two games for each mainline game right? I mean sure, we didn't get Z but it wouldn't have done much in the long run besides getting both the legends from the two games they are stuck in exclusively.

36/40 seems like a good score. And S/M isn't really a bad game gameplay wise either...what's your point?

As in SM had 38/40 so this (USUM) scoring less would just add fuel to the fire for those who are criticizing these games. Ever since the games got leak, people have been pretty down on them for its content even tho its pretty much what you expect for third versions. Honestly most people on this site have been fine about it, but on other sites its a whole other story to the point that they say that GameFreak shouldn't be making the main games anymore.

Who hates it? Also S/M is a fresh air and does new things and many liked it.

I was talking about USUM. Again you have to see other more Pokemon centric sites that are complaining about them. The games have leaked so people know what content it has. Although it has pretty much the content you would expect from these versions, people are being really annoying about because it did not add some things (even tho it added new pokemon something that third versions never do). I understand not wanting to play through Alola again (its been only a year) or not having time to play it due to the Switch etc, but some are complaining because it didn't meet their ridiculous expectations.

Uhh...you do know that Pokemon has a long history of releasing two games for each mainline game right? I mean sure, we didn't get Z but it wouldn't have done much in the long run besides getting both the legends from the two games they are stuck in exclusively.

.....I don't recall third version games ever releasing two games. (sorry if I was not clear that I was still talking about USUM). Crystal, Emerald and Platinum all had one versions and while I consider B2/W2 have some expects of being a third version game, those had an excuse of being a sequel which is why they were split in two. Based on everything we know of USUM, its content is basically what you expect from a third version, but instead of getting one game we got two (since it worked for B2W2). Its possible Pokemon "Z" would have been split in two since it worked out well for B2W2 sales wise.

But anyways, I know in the long run its a minority that are complaining about it, but its just really annoying to see. Its fine if they don't want to play it, just don't be annoying about it >: and hope that Gen 8 has the things you want.

36/40= All 4 reviewers gave the game 9 from 10 possible points. The same score B/W 2 received. I actually don't get both of your postings because they are really confusing written.

Its fine if they don't want to play it, just don't be annoying about it >: and hope that Gen 8 has the things you want.

Isn't that the reason the whole Pokemon community is so highly pessimistic? Along with Final Fantasy Fantasy, it's one of the most pessmistic and hateful communities when it comes to singleplayer experiences. Every new Pokemon Generation is doomed and every new game is bad in retroperspective. It started with Black and White, then Black and White 2 was the Candyman, but after X/Y were released, both Black and White games weren't so bad after all. Now, both X/Y and S/M is hated by the community. The same will happen to US/UM and it will only go further down from here. What I learned the past years is, everyone should stay away from these highly pessimistic smartasses who don't accept nothing. Sounds a little harsh, but I enjoy the Internet a little more since I ignore these pricks. I mean, it should be obvious every game has it flaws, but there is a limit of criticism toward the games.

Conclusion: 36/40 is a really good score for a direct sequel.

kuro
Tue Nov 14 17 05:20pm
(Updated 1 time)

Yeah I agree my post wasn't written clearly. I agree that 36/40 is a great score. I was talking how the naysayers will say the game is clearly inferior to SM (which scored 38 ) because of it. Due to the leaks, they know what the game contains and are being very negative about it, so this 36 is just adding more fuel to the fire. The Western reviews came out today and they have been doing really great (87 on Metacritic), but they are now saying "It's pokemon ofc it will score high, still not buying etc". Its due to a combination of it not being on Switch and the game not having some things that they wanted. I also had somethings I wanted to see that didn't make it, but the games still have plenty of post-game content and changes that are very new for third versions (not really sure how they are mad about USUM, but not with Crystal, Emerald or Platinum)

You make a very good point about them doom the new thing, but later wanting it. I remember when they were complaining that Mega Evolutions shouldn't be a thing and that they should be regular evolutions instead (because we did not have any new evolutions to existing Pokemon since Gen 4). Now that Gen 7 has no new Mega Evolutions, they are now mad they aren't getting new Megas. Gen 8 will have the same problems because people are expecting BotW Pokemon...

Want to join this discussion?

You should like, totally log in or sign up!